About Me

My photo
My name is Ian. Sometimes I write things.

Sunday, August 18, 2019

Have Regard For This Vine

I preached this sermon on Psalm 80 at Dulin United Methodist Church.

----------------------------------

"Have Regard For This Vine"
August 18, 2019

If I had to name the one fact about myself that probably surprises the most amount of people, it would be this: I’m a big fan of country music. I know, I know, I’m not the typical representative of the country music target demographic. It’s not the genre that most people expect a brown classically trained vocalist from the great state of New York of all places who is an unapologetic feminist with a political framework that falls…let’s just say on the left end of the spectrum to be blasting in the car while on a long road trip or using to pump himself up in the gym.

Truth be told, I’m not entirely sure what it is about country music that keeps my radio dial tuned to 98.7 WMZQ, DC’s one stop shop for today’s best country (if anyone out there has any connections to iHeart Radio, I'll happily accept a sponsorship deal). When I was a kid, I actually hated the genre, but that didn’t stop my own father from listening to the likes of Shania Twain and Alan Jackson while my brother and I were stuck in the car with him.

But as I got older, there was something about the simplicity of the genre that drew me back in. And yeah, yeah, I know that a lot of that is probably as manufactured and authentic as the tchotchkes in a Cracker Barrel Country Store right off the interstate, but at their best, country songs tell stories. Stories about love and loss. Life and death. Joy and hardship. And the music lets those stories shine through. You know, three chords and the truth and all that.

And sure. I get that it has a reputation of being sometimes overly dramatic or melancholy. But let’s be honest. If your wife leaves you, your dog dies, and your truck breaks down, you’re not having a great day, are you?

At its best, country music is deeply relatable. Consider, if you will, Miranda Lambert’s hit 2013 single “Mama’s Broken Heart”. It’s a song about a girl who is having a rough time going through a breakup. And so her mom—who comes from, as the narrator puts it, a “softer generation”—comes along and tells her to go and fix your makeup girl, it’s just a breakup girl…start acting like a lady…I raised you better even when you fall apart, to which the narrator defiantly cries out “but this ain’t my mama’s broken heart”.

Now hold onto your seats, because this might shock you, but not once in my life have I been a young girl going through a traumatic breakup. I know, right? I’m as surprised as you are. And yet, I still really relate to this song. Throughout my life, I’ve felt all sorts of implied and explicit pressures to keep my emotions in check—to get a grip and bite my lip just to save a little face. To never let ‘em see you cry. These pressures have come from places as intimate as family members and friends to external forces from the media and culture at large. I’ve never felt the urge to cut my bangs with some rusty kitchen scissors like the girl in the song, but I have felt the need to suppress the feelings I was feeling, and so I find something really cathartic about the narrator’s clapback to the one telling her to stuff it all in.

I suspect that I’m not the only one in here who feels pressured to suppress their emotions from time to time. To build up a thick façade and present a picture of your life to the world that is perfect, all while stifling any emotional expression that might reveal the cracks. Because if the world knew the honest truth about how we were feeling, that perfect picture we spent so long and worked so hard at cultivating would fall apart and the wall would come tumbling down and we’d be left in a state of profound vulnerability that, in spite of the instinct to share everything in our networked and digital age, is a posture we just aren’t accustomed to in today’s day and age. A state of profound vulnerability with which we haven’t been comfortable for a really long time. We can thank stoicism for that.

You see, in the Greco-Roman world, in which everything about life, society, and culture was highly ordered, the goal in life—regardless of who you were or what your station was—was to be as virtuous and manly as possible. Influenced by the stoic philosophers of their time, who believed that the virtuous life was a life governed by reason and dispassionate rational thinking, being as manly as possible included not letting emotional responses dictate the way you lived your life. This kind of virtuous life is one that everyone, regardless of their gender, was to strive for. Having an emotional outburst of any sort made you more womanly, which was to be avoided at all costs.

The hold of the Patriarchy goes way back.

A couple thousand years and one boost from an Enlightenment later and this gendered line of thinking still persists. When we tell our boys to man up or that men don’t cry—usually at the sight of a quivering lip or as their eyes are starting to well up with tears—we are reinforcing this dangerous ideology: that to show your emotions or express your feelings is womanly and to appear womanly robs you of your worth as a human. And how many times have women been told, in response to emotional distress, abuse, harassment, or trauma, that if they want to survive in a man’s world, they’ll just have to suck it up? It’s the same dangerous, underlying philosophy, just remixed for a different gender.

Of course, when we name it like that and put it in those terms, it sounds absurd to us. I’m sure that there is no one in here that consciously thinks that womanly expressions make a person inherently less worthy. And if there does happen to be anyone in here who does think that, I would like to kindly direct your attention to our two United Methodist Women groups who are, in all of their womanly glory, doing amazing work in the Falls Church community and beyond to keep our church’s mission and vision alive and well.

Nevertheless, even though we recognize that the underlying reason behind our discomfort when it comes to expressing our emotions is sexist and dangerous, the fact remains that we still have difficulty giving those who we interact with—even those who we are most close with, our friends and our family—an honest and authentic picture of our emotional state of minds. Who among us, when asked “how are you doing?” have never responded with “fine” when we knew, deep down, that things were not fine. That the world was not fine. That we were not fine.

Image Description: A two panel comic strip. The first panel has a brown dog wearing a hat nonchalantly sitting at a dining room table with a cup of coffee on it. The room around the dog is engulfed in flames and thick smoke fills the air. The second panel is a closer look at the dog, now smiling, in the room that's on fire. A speech bubble is above the dog, signifying that the dog is saying "This is fine."
Credit: KC Green
And I’ll be the first to admit that the church isn’t blameless when it comes to this. I grew up in a church that was very—let’s just say, prim and proper. Everything had to be perfect. Our choirs had to be the best choirs. Our preachers had to be the best, most qualified preachers. Our sanctuary had to be the prettiest, most beautifully ornate sanctuary. And don’t get me wrong, I really did love it. I loved listening to our world-renowned organist-in-residence wail away at magnificent preludes and postludes. I wouldn’t trade the crash course on theological discourse that my young mind tried to absorb in the form of dense sermons for anything in the world. Both experiences laid the foundation for my love of music and theology that I carry with me to this day. But as I look back on those formative years, I have to confess that I rarely, if ever, received the message that it’s okay to not be okay.

How many times, when we have gathered for worship throughout our lives, have we received that message?

How often does it appear in our hymns?

How often does it appear in our prayers?

In our fellowship together?

My guess is that for many of us, the answer would be not enough.

And that’s a real shame, because when we look at our scriptural witness, we see a profoundly different picture. Our lesson from the Psalms is just one example among many.

Like the Isaiah text, The Psalm uses imagery of a vineyard destroyed. However, unlike the Isaiah text, the destruction of the vineyard in the Psalm is not seen as an act of righteous judgement but rather carries the perception that God failed to be faithful to the covenant.
You brought a vine out of Egypt; you drove out the nations and planted it.
You cleared the ground for it; it took deep root and filled the land.
The mountains were covered with its shade, the mighty cedars with its branches;
It sent out its branches to the sea, and its shoots to the River.
Why then have you broken down its walls, so that all who pass along the way pluck at its fruit? 
Why then have you broken down its walls?

Why then have you broken down its walls?

This isn’t a prayer of confession. The psalmist doesn’t say that they did anything wrong, nor are they pleading for forgiveness.

It’s not the result of an act of repentance. The psalmist even makes a point of later saying then we will never turn back from youthen we will never turn back from you. Not “we know that we turned away from you and have seen the error of our ways and have reoriented our lives back to you”. No. It’s let your hand be upon us again and then we will never turn back from you.

This prayer is something else entirely. It’s called a lament. And guess what. The book of Psalms is full of them. As many as one third of the Psalms are Psalms of lament. It’s why sixteenth century Swiss reformer, John Calvin, called them “an anatomy of all parts of the soul” since they represent all the emotions we could ever know we have like a mirror.

Or, as a chaplain of mine was fond of saying, “Your wife left you, your dog died, and your truck broke down? There’s a Psalm for that.”

These Psalms of lament encourage us to look at the fire raging all around us and say this isn’t fine. Things are not fine. The world is not fine. We are not fine.

And what’s more, these Psalms also encourage us to adopt that same posture in our relationship with God. The book of Psalms is our common scriptural prayer book, after all. Each of the one hundred and fifty Psalms teach us how to pray in ways that are authentic to our lived experiences and faithful to God. And the Psalms of lament have a special place in that scriptural liturgy. Denise Dombkowski Hopkins, author of Journey Through the Psalms and my Hebrew Bible professor while I was at Wesley, identifies the Psalms of lament as being the most faithful prayers a believer can pray. It’s really easy to pray a prayer of thanksgiving, she says, but to be in a place of deep despair and to cry out “show yourself…come save us!” shows that you, 1) still acknowledge that God exists and cares about your cries and 2) believe that God has the capacity to do something about them and relieve them.

Laments come from a place of deep hope. Hope in a world more perfect than the world we find ourselves in. Hope that that more perfect world is possible.

I remember a romantic heartbreak that I went through a few years ago during my time at seminary. And to make matters worse, the heartbreak carried with it a shake to my sense of call. I knew that I had lost the relationship, but I desperately wanted that strong sense of call back.

I tried praying like I was typically taught—hands folded, head down. I tried reaching out to friends and pastors for support. But in the end, what brought me the most peace was sneaking into the chapel late one night after class.

It was dark.

I was the only one there.

And I just let God have it.

If you remember that one scene from the West Wing where Jed Bartlett is in the National Cathedral after his secretary and long-time friend’s funeral, it was kind of like that, only louder and with less Latin.

I screamed at God.

I cussed God out using just about every word in the book.

I questioned what more God wanted from me.

And when I ran out of words and my voice gave out, I collapsed onto the floor and wept like I hadn’t wept in a long time.

And as the walls of that sacred space echoed with the sounds of my cries and my profanities, I felt a calming presence wash over me. That night, I had the best night’s sleep that I had had since the breakup.

God doesn’t want us to stifle our emotions in the ways we interact with and relate to anyone.

God doesn’t tell us to fix our makeup.

God doesn’t tell us to get over it.

God doesn’t tell us to keep it together even when we fall apart.

Each and every one of our emotions is a God-given gift that we are meant to honestly and faithfully express in our lives and in our relationships, especially our relationship with God. Because guess what. God already knows the full extent of our emotional well-being.

When we lament, we honor our realities—our actual, messy realities; not the pristine and perfect ones we try to convince the world and ourselves are real.

And naming that things aren’t fine is the first step we need to take on the road to making a world that is.

Sunday, August 4, 2019

Sacrificing to the Baals

I preached this sermon on Hosea 11:1-11 at Dulin United Methodist Church. If this sermon drives you to action, consider making a donation to Everytown for Gun Safety.

---------------------

"Sacrificing to the Baals"
August 4, 2019
Eighth Sunday After Pentecost, Year C

“Your Majesties, Your Royal Highnesses, Excellencies,

“Members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Ladies and Gentlemen,

“Today, in Afghanistan, a girl will be born. Her mother will hold her and feed her, comfort her and care for her – just as any mother would anywhere in the world. In these most basic acts of human nature, humanity knows no divisions. But to be born a girl in today’s Afghanistan is to begin life centuries away from the prosperity that one small part of humanity has achieved. It is to live under conditions that many of us in this hall would consider inhuman.”

So begins the lecture former United Nations Security General, Kofi Annan, gave to the Nobel Committee upon receiving the centennial Nobel Peace Prize in 2001, nearly twenty years ago. Though, if we’re being honest, not much has changed in twenty years. That Afghan girl could very well have been born today. “We have entered the third millennium through a gate of fire,” Annan said three months after the events of September 11th.

Looking around now, maybe it wasn’t just the gate that was on fire.

It seems as though we have not learned our lesson. That hate begets hate and violence begets more violence and division begets more division.

Today, on the heels of yet another—I hate that word; another—mass shooting within our borders at the hands of homegrown white nationalist terrorism, that reality feels all too true. And sure, I could stand up here and say something like “God’s still on the throne,” but if I’m being honest with myself, that theological proclamation is starting to ring a little hollow. Because this—all of this—has been going on for a long time. A long time. Much longer than twenty years even. It goes all the way back to those pesky Baals.

Now, those of you unfamiliar with the intricacies of the foreign and domestic policies of the ancient divided kingdoms of Israel and Judah and who are following along in the bulletin are probably wondering what the heck is going on with that sermon title. Sacrificing to the Baals. Well, you all are in luck because the intricacies of the foreign and domestic policies of the divided kingdoms of Israel and Judah are just the kinds of things that I kind of like to nerd out over.

I’m a real hoot at dinner parties.

The long and short of it is that all of their troubles boiled town to an economic system wherein wealthy landowners who lived in urban centers bought up and rented out land out in rural areas. Those who rented and worked the land could never afford to own it themselves, in part because the fruits of their labor went back to their landlords. It created a vicious and endless cycle of indebtedness and poverty and the land being overworked and stripped of its nutrients, becoming less and less fertile with each passing year. And what, might you ask, were those wealthy and elite landowners doing with the fruits of their tenants’ labor? Everything in their power to secure their own power and status. They would pay massive tributes to foreign empires in the hopes that they would deal peacefully with them, massive tributes that more often than not, came in the form of sacrifices to the gods and idols, also known as Baals, of the Assyrians and Babylonians (named after the Assyrian fertility god, Baal). The very empires that would eventually swallow them up and destroy their way of life.

So to recap, the ancient Israelite elite exploited their own people and used the results of their exploitation not to lift up the marginalized but to secure their own status by making lavish sacrifices to a foreign fertility god whose empire would one day totally conquer their land and spread them throughout the Levant.

We all on the same page? Exploitation. Sacrifice. Destruction.

The fall of the two kingdoms posed a major problem of theology for the people of God at that time. Though we now understand the Abrahamic religions to be what we call radically monotheistic—that is, there is one God and only one God—this wasn’t always the case. When we look at the texts written before the exile, we don’t find an outright denial of the existence of other Gods. Take the first commandment: “I am the Lord your God…you shall have no other gods before me” you shall have no other gods before me; before me. It doesn’t say “I am the Lord your God and I’m the only God”. No, it says you shall have no other gods before me. As in, “yeah, sure there might be other gods out there, but I am your God and I come first in your lives.” It’s what religious scholars call henotheism, the worship of one God while not denying the existence or even possible existence of other, lesser deities.

And that lesser is an important distinction. In those times, gods were intimately linked with a nation’s identity, and the strength of a nation’s god was directly proportional to the strength of the nation itself. If two nations went to war with each other, the nation that won had a god who was stronger than the other nation’s god. And well, if your country lost the war or, heaven forbid, was conquered, then your god wasn’t all that great anyways so might as well start worshipping something else.

So yeah, when Israel and Judah fell to the Assyrians and the Babylonians respectively, they had a bit of a religious crisis on their hands. If Israel and Judah fell and their land was occupied and their people dispersed throughout the Ancient Near East and the Temple, God’s very own dwelling place, was destroyed, that must have meant that the God they worshipped—the God of Abraham and their ancestors—was weaker than the gods of the Assyrians and Babylonians and therefore less deserving of their worship and adoration. The loss of their land and power and status brought with it a loss of their religion too.

And yet, it’s also right around this time that we see a shift in the texts to a profession of that radical monotheism we’re familiar with today. Adonai, the God of Abraham and their ancestors was no longer seen as one God among many or even the strongest God among many, but rather the one and only God. The gods of the Assyrians and Babylonians, the Baals, were false gods. Their statues and idols were merely wood and stone. You didn’t take us over because our God is weaker than you; we’re the ones who fell away from our God.

We disobeyed the commandments.

We neglected to care for the most marginalized people. The orphan. The widow. The immigrant.

We stole their land and resources to pay tribute to foreign empires—to make sacrifices to their Baals.

Tribute and sacrifice that we thought would protect us.

Protect our status.

Protect our power.

Protect our privilege.

And if protecting ourselves meant stealing from our children and our elderly and our impoverished citizens—the very people our God commanded us to protect—so be it.

Your gods didn’t defeat our God! Our God used you to punish us for our transgressions.

And you know, I have to say. As far as theological Judo goes, that’s an outstanding move.

It’s the kind of move that allows a religion to not only survive, but flourish while the community is in the wilderness of exile, waiting for the day when God will settle them in their homes.

Now, before I continue, there’s a quick pastoral distinction I need to make. Note the conditions and context from whence that theology emerged. The community from which it comes is living through and reflecting on their own experiences. It’s not coming from a place of comfort and ease towards another person. They’re trying to make sense of their own trauma. The challenge with this kind of theological reasoning—that suffering is the result of God punishing us for our transgressions—is that it’s really easy to, with even the best of intentions in the world, externalize and push that theology on others living though their own traumatic experiences.

It’s one thing for me, myself, to say “the Lord is testing me” or “I screwed up”.

It’s quite another altogether for me to say to someone else “the Lord is testing you” or “you know, this is really your fault”, especially when I have more power and privilege than that someone else. 

And, to be perfectly clear, that line of thought isn’t universal in the prophetic texts either. In some places, sure, the prophets paint a picture of a God whose justice is swift. A God who is leading the armies of the Assyrians and the Babylonians. But in other places, like our text this morning, we see a more nuanced approached. In this chapter, Hosea doesn’t paint a picture of God who is destroying Israel Godself. On the contrary. In this chapter, Hosea paints a picture of God who laments. Who grieves. Who mourns God’s children’s infidelity. The more I called them, the further they went from me. How can I hand you over Israel? How can I make you like Admah or treat you like Zeboiim; those two cities in the plain of Sodom and Gomorrah?

Hosea tells us that none of this—absolutely none of this—is what God desires. None of this brings God any joy. My heart winces within me.

My heart winces within me.

It’s a cry that reverberates through time and space.

Because, if we’re being honest, those Baals haven’t gone away, have they?

Oh sure, Assyria was eventually destroyed, and for that matter, so was Babylon. Their Baals and other idols reduced to rubble or, if they were lucky, sitting in a museum somewhere. But their lure has persisted through the ages and persists still today using different names and slogans and structures.

White supremacy.

Christian nationalism.

America first.

Privatized prisons.

Colonialism.

Nuclear proliferation (because pulling out of a nuclear treaty literally the week before we remember the anniversary of dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki is par for the course, I guess). 

Militarized police forces.

Sexism.

Heteronormativity.

The NRA.

Thoughts and prayers.

Capitalism run amok.

Border security.

National security.

The military industrial complex.

Profit that comes from destroying our planet.

Profit that comes from destroying lives.

Patriarchy.

Every single time we try to protect ourselves and our own institutions at the expense of others.

All Baals. Every last one of them and more.

We pay tribute to them. We bow down and worship them. We make sacrifices to them. The lives of our children. And our children’s children. And our children’s children’s children. We think that if we just make one more sacrifice or say one more prayer to these false gods, then everything will be made right in the world without having to make any real change on our parts. Without realizing that the sacrifices we’re making and the tributes we’re paying are costing us everything; are costing us the lives of the very people we are called to protect and care for.

If we continue down this road, we can expect the same fate as those who came before us. Swords striking wildly in our cities, consuming our gates, and taking away everything we hold dear.

But there’s another way.

“Each of us,” Annan says, “has the right to take pride in our particular faith or heritage. But the notion that what is ours is necessarily in conflict with what is theirs is both false and dangerous. It has resulted in endless enmity and conflict, leading men to commit the greatest of crimes in the name of a higher power.” 

“It need not be so,” he continues, “We can love what we are, without hating what—and who—we are not.”

We can love what we are without hating what we are not.

We can hear the voice of God, roaring out like a lioness, and return to her like we are her cubs. We can turn away from the Baals enticing lure and re-align our lives with what God desires for us. All of us. Each and every one of us. Rich and poor. Free and fettered. Privileged and humiliated.

That might mean giving up our own power or letting go of our own privilege to stand alongside those who are most marginalized.

Or maybe it means using our power to be co-creators with God of God’s justice—using our power to dismantle the systems and structures that privilege certain people over others.

Both can be true.

Both have to be true.

“Your Majesties,

“Excellencies,

“Ladies and Gentlemen,

“You will recall that I began my address with a reference to the girl born in Afghanistan today. Even though her mother will do all in her power to protect and sustain her, there is a one-in-four risk that she will not live to see her fifth birthday. Whether she does is just one test of our common humanity – of our belief in our individual responsibility for our fellow men and women.

“But it is the only test that matters.”